Planning policy requires demonstration that proposals won't harm heritage significance. Without a Heritage Statement, officers typically assume potential harm and may refuse applications. Our statements provide the evidence base officers need for confident approval.

A Heritage Statement describes heritage significance and assesses development impact. Heritage Impact Assessment focuses specifically on evaluating impacts-often used interchangeably with Heritage Statement in UK practice. Statement of Significance describes what makes an asset important without addressing development proposals-typically for grants or repairs rather than planning applications.

Heritage-based refusal typically indicates either genuine harm requiring design revision, or inadequate heritage justification. Our statements anticipate officer concerns and provide robust justification. If refusal occurs, we'll review the decision and advise on appeal prospects versus design amendments.

We review your project type, location, and complexity to identify the most qualified network member. Your matched specialist provides the quote and conducts a 15-minute consultation call before you proceed, ensuring you work with someone with relevant experience.

Yes-our network includes specialists across the UK who understand regional planning variations and local building traditions. You'll be matched with someone experienced in your area and building type.

Yes-network members regularly collaborate with architectural practices and consultants. We integrate heritage considerations into design development and can attend team meetings and provide iterative advice.

Standard Heritage Statements: 10-15 working days. Design Reviews: 3-5 working days. Complex assessments: 3-6 weeks depending on scope.

Research, significance assessment, impact analysis, one site visit if required, one round of client feedback and amendment, and final planning-ready PDF with professional sign-off.

Heritage assessment requires understanding complex policy frameworks and officer expectations. Inadequate justification frequently causes expensive delays or refusals. Professional advice upfront typically costs less than architectural time lost to planning delays.